Towards a Christocentric Canonical Method

This study examines the theological status of the cosmic conflict motif within Seventh-day Adventist theology and biblical interpretation. While the Great Controversy theme has often been described as the central narrative of Scripture in popular Adventist discourse, such claims raise methodological concerns regarding the imposition of an external interpretive framework upon the biblical text. This paper argues that the cosmic conflict motif functions most coherently not as a controlling meta-narrative but as a canonical synthesis that emerges from the biblical witness when interpreted through the epistemological center of the cross. Through a canonical analysis of key conflict passages—including Genesis 3, Job 1–2, Daniel 7–8, and Revelation 12—the study traces how Scripture portrays rebellion, divine judgment, and the vindication of God’s governance within a unified narrative structure. Particular attention is given to apocalyptic judgment imagery and sanctuary language in Daniel and Hebrews, demonstrating how these motifs converge in the revelation of Christ’s redemptive work. The paper further considers methodological risks associated with speculative expansion of the conflict motif and proposes a christocentric framework that safeguards both biblical fidelity and evangelical commitments. When disciplined by canonical method and centered in the cross, the cosmic conflict motif provides an integrative theological perspective that preserves the coherence of key Adventist doctrines while remaining anchored in the gospel.